Transcription:
The role of art
Should I have totally free expression?
I wonder, where are we now to ask this question?
Who has the right to ask that question?
Who has the right to ignore that question?
Is this question a sign that art is not free and expression is not free right now?
What is a free expression of art?
Is art is unanimous maybe it doesn’t matter. Who is responsible of producing that (free or not)?
Who will regulate art?
Is art itself a system of regulation?
Does art need regulation?
Is it irresponsible to not regulate art?
In Ukraine artists feel guilty to produce art during the war that is going on. My question is, is it ok that it is like this?
Does this mean that art is not for everyone?
Would that mean that art is trivial?
Is that meaning that art is a privileged? Does art considered useless?
Is art useful?
How can art be useful? What does it need to be useful?
Does its power lies on its uselessness?
For who is its use, isn’t it like that in history we know that art has been used in a bad way?
Is art making a matter of responsibility?
What does that mean if I feel guilty to make art? Does that mean that art it is not free expression?
Does that mean that society puts more value in war than art?
What’s the value of art in a war?
Can art stop a war?
Can art start a war?
Can art provoke a war?
Can a war stop art?
Can we select art? Or type of art?
Does free expression mean that all types of art are included? What types of art are unacceptable? What types of expression are unacceptable?
Isn’t it like that, when we talk for something unacceptable that the answer would be to point for the freedom of expression and speech?
When do we know when an expression is art?
Does it matter if we know?
What is art?
What is freedom and what is a war?
When is art?
Is it freedom the right to choose?
Are we free to choose? In what extend?
Is it freedom a responsibility to choose?
Can we call it the end of the conversation?
No comments:
Post a Comment